29 APRIL 2025, TUESDAY
15:30-16:45 ORAL PRESENTATION SESSION - 8
The Role of Low Anxiety Scores on Novelty Responses in Preclinical Alzheimers Groups
Ugur Cikrikcili1, Thomas Nickl Jockschat2, Björn Schott3, Ulaş Ay4, René Lattmann55, David Berron5, Emrah Duzel6
-
Show more (Affiliations)
1. Institute of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Almanya
2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Almanya
3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Almanya
4. Hulusi Behçet Yaşam Bilimleri Araştırma Laboratuvarı, İstanbul Üniversitesi, İstanbul, Türkiye
5. 5German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
6. nstitute of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Almanya
DOI: 10.5080/kes27.abs65 Page 89
BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to explore the relationship between anxiety scores and amygdala novelty responses across different stages of preclinical AD.
METHODS (Ethic Committee: 20190327_SOP-DM-14_A01_V01_Antrag_auf_Abgabe_von_Daten_Biomaterialproben Page):The study included 185 participants categorized into Healthy Controls (n = 56), Subjective Cognitive Decline (n = 86), and Mild Cognitive Impairment (n = 43). SCD and MCI diagnoses were made according to Jessen et al. 2014 and NIAA-AA 2011 diagnostic criterias, respectively. Anxiety levels were assessed using the short form of the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAIS-SF), while functional MRI (fMRI) measured amygdala responses to novel stimuli. Every groups in the study were divided into two; the first group consisted of people with a GAI-SF score of 0; the second group consisted of people with a score of 1 and above. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, including p-Tau and t-Tau, were used to classify tau pathology. Preclinical Alzheimers Cognitive Composite 5 (PACC5) designed to detect subtle cognitive changes in the preclinical stage of Alzheimers disease.
RESULTS:Anxiety symptoms were significantly elevated in the SCD and MCI groups compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Despite this, there was no significant association between anxiety severity and amygdala novelty responses across diagnostic groups. Furthermore, tau pathology (p-Tau, t-Tau) did not show a significant interaction with anxiety symptoms in predicting amygdala activity. The absence of a clear relationship may be influenced by the generally low severity of anxiety symptoms within the study cohort, potentially limiting the detection of neural alterations.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that how anxiety scores do not significantly alter amygdala novelty responses. The low anxiety scores are due to the fact that people with major psychiatric disorders were not included in the study. This narrows the scope of the study and can be considered as a limitation. It's thought that this situation will shed light on future studies.
27th National Clinical Education Symposium Presentation Abstracts